Glen Waverley vs Notting Hill, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Glen Waverley | Notting Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 72.8/100 | 38.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 16.3/100 | 31.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 63.5 / 1k | 105.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 23 | — |
| Public transport stops | 194 | 17 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 49.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 689 | 131 |
| Planning activity | 407 | 35 |
| Population | 42,642 | 2,895 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesGlen Waverley
- Best for familiesGlen Waverley
- Best for investmentGlen Waverley
- Best for best valueGlen Waverley
- Best for best schoolsGlen Waverley
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Glen Waverley is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Notting Hill is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Glen Waverley pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, whereas Notting Hill is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Glen Waverley, while Notting Hill remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.