Overall score
Glen Waverley
73.0/100
Mount Waverley
73.1/100
Glen Waverley for investment; Mount Waverley for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glen Waverley
73.0/100
Mount Waverley
73.1/100
Crime rate
Glen Waverley
58.5 / 1k
Mount Waverley
49.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glen Waverley
693
Mount Waverley
385
Population
Glen Waverley
42,642
Mount Waverley
35,340
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glen Waverley | Mount Waverley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 73.0/100 | 73.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 16.3/100 | 26.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 58.5 / 1k | 49.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 23 | 32 |
| Public transport stops | 192 | 138 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 94.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 693 | 385 |
| Planning activity | 407 | 469 |
| Population | 42,642 | 35,340 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Glen Waverley reads as an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Mount Waverley is a hills larger suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Waverley sits among greener hillside streets, while Glen Waverley keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Glen Waverley tends to lead on schools and education options and public transport access, while Mount Waverley stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Investors may find Glen Waverley the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mount Waverley.