Mount Waverley vs Oakleigh, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Mount Waverley | Oakleigh |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 72.9/100 | 61.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 26.2/100 | 16.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.5 / 1k | 229.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 32 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 140 | 95 |
| Walkability | 94.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 385 | 697 |
| Planning activity | 469 | 129 |
| Population | 35,340 | 8,442 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesMount Waverley
- Best for familiesMount Waverley
- Best for best valueMount Waverley
- Best for best schoolsMount Waverley
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Mount Waverley is a hills larger suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Oakleigh is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Mount Waverley sits among greener hillside streets, while Oakleigh keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Waverley is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Oakleigh answers with walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mount Waverley, while Oakleigh remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.