Mount Waverley vs Oakleigh, VIC Suburb Comparison

Mount Waverley for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount WaverleyOakleigh

Overall score

Mount Waverley

62.0/100

Oakleigh

57.0/100

Crime rate

Mount Waverley

48.4 / 1k

Oakleigh

209.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Waverley

406

Oakleigh

704

Population

Mount Waverley

35,340

Oakleigh

8,442

Metric leadMount Waverley 7Oakleigh 42 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount WaverleyOakleigh
Overall score62.0/10057.0/100
Housing (desirability)41.9/10045.5/100
Crime rate48.4 / 1k209.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools99
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves326
Public transport stops13893
Walkability94.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities406704
Planning activity469129
Green cover8.6%6.0%
Population35,3408,442
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mount Waverley is a hills larger suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Oakleigh is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Mount Waverley sits among greener hillside streets, while Oakleigh keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Waverley is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Oakleigh answers with walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Waverley, while Oakleigh remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons