Cliftleigh vs Kurri Kurri, NSW Suburb Comparison

Cliftleigh for families and schools; Kurri Kurri for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CliftleighKurri Kurri

Overall score

Cliftleigh

47.1/100

Kurri Kurri

35.8/100

Crime rate

Cliftleigh

46.2 / 1k

Kurri Kurri

90.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cliftleigh

15

Kurri Kurri

90

Population

Cliftleigh

2,309

Kurri Kurri

6,174

Metric leadCliftleigh 5Kurri Kurri 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCliftleighKurri Kurri
Overall score47.1/10035.8/100
Housing (desirability)52.8/10072.7/100
Crime rate46.2 / 1k90.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools—6
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves—5
Public transport stops2686
Walkability30.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities1590
Planning activity342
Green cover10.2%4.3%
Population2,3096,174
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cliftleigh is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Kurri Kurri is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cliftleigh sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Kurri Kurri is in a middle-ring position.

Cliftleigh pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Kurri Kurri is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability. Cliftleigh generally means more sought-after housing, while Kurri Kurri leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Cliftleigh if you are weighing retirees, families, and investors; lean toward Kurri Kurri for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons