suburb.guide

Clontarf vs Redcliffe, QLD Suburb Comparison

Clontarf for value; Redcliffe for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClontarfRedcliffe

Overall score

Clontarf

50.3/100

Redcliffe

51.8/100

Crime rate

Clontarf

88.4 / 1k

Redcliffe

74.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clontarf

231

Redcliffe

373

Population

Clontarf

8,446

Redcliffe

10,460

Metric leadClontarf 2Redcliffe 73 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClontarfRedcliffe
Overall score50.3/10051.8/100
Housing (desirability)64.8/10071.5/100
Crime rate88.4 / 1k74.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves99
Public transport stops3753
Walkability90.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities231373
Green cover14.3%5.9%
Population8,44610,460
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Clontarf is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone, and Redcliffe is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.

On the data, Clontarf is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Redcliffe answers with a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability.

Clontarf suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Redcliffe is the stronger match for families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Clontarf vs Redcliffe, QLD Suburb Comparison | Suburb Guide