Cobblebank vs Melton South, VIC Suburb Comparison

Cobblebank for families and value; Melton South for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CobblebankMelton South

Overall score

Cobblebank

31.8/100

Melton South

37.4/100

Crime rate

Cobblebank

47.0 / 1k

Melton South

89.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cobblebank

27

Melton South

192

Population

Cobblebank

3,601

Melton South

11,362

Metric leadCobblebank 4Melton South 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCobblebankMelton South
Overall score31.8/10037.4/100
Housing (desirability)39.9/10039.5/100
Crime rate47.0 / 1k89.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves35
Public transport stops741
Walkability10.5/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities27192
Planning activity3361
Green cover3.1%8.5%
Population3,60111,362
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/101/10

Comparison summary

Cobblebank reads as a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible; Melton South is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cobblebank sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Melton South is in a middle-ring position.

Cobblebank tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, while Melton South stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access. Cobblebank generally means more approachable mid-market housing, while Melton South leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees may find Cobblebank the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Melton South.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons