Cobblebank vs Thornhill Park, VIC Suburb Comparison

Cobblebank for families; Thornhill Park for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CobblebankThornhill Park

Overall score

Cobblebank

31.8/100

Thornhill Park

31.4/100

Crime rate

Cobblebank

47.0 / 1k

Thornhill Park

229.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cobblebank

27

Thornhill Park

36

Population

Cobblebank

3,601

Thornhill Park

3,066

Metric leadCobblebank 4Thornhill Park 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCobblebankThornhill Park
Overall score31.8/10031.4/100
Housing (desirability)39.9/10049.8/100
Crime rate47.0 / 1k229.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves3—
Public transport stops718
Walkability10.5/10027.0/100
Nearby amenities2736
Planning activity3345
Green cover3.1%3.3%
Population3,6013,066
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Cobblebank reads as a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible; Thornhill Park is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Cobblebank tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and a larger local community, while Thornhill Park stands out for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Cobblebank sits in a approachable band, compared with a gently premium feel in Thornhill Park.

Retirees and families may find Cobblebank the better fit, while investors and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Thornhill Park.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons