Overall score
Rockbank
45.6/100
Thornhill Park
46.5/100
Thornhill Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Rockbank
45.6/100
Thornhill Park
46.5/100
Crime rate
Rockbank
290.9 / 1k
Thornhill Park
205.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Rockbank
50
Thornhill Park
24
Population
Rockbank
2,583
Thornhill Park
3,066
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Rockbank | Thornhill Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.6/100 | 46.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 290.9 / 1k | 205.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 14 | 18 |
| Walkability | 21.0/100 | 27.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 50 | 24 |
| Planning activity | 36 | 45 |
| Population | 2,583 | 3,066 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Rockbank is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Thornhill Park is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city. Rockbank sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Thornhill Park is further out with more breathing room.
Rockbank pulls ahead on schools and education options and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Thornhill Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Thornhill Park, while Rockbank remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.