Aintree vs Thornhill Park, VIC suburb comparison

Aintree for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AintreeThornhill Park

Overall score

Aintree

60.5/100

Thornhill Park

46.5/100

Crime rate

Aintree

52.4 / 1k

Thornhill Park

205.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aintree

102

Thornhill Park

24

Population

Aintree

7,982

Thornhill Park

3,066

Metric leadAintree 8Thornhill Park 02 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAintreeThornhill Park
Overall score60.5/10046.5/100
Housing (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Crime rate52.4 / 1k205.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools41
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops2018
Walkability59.0/10027.0/100
Nearby amenities10224
Planning activity4545
Population7,9823,066
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Aintree reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Thornhill Park is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city. Aintree sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Thornhill Park is further out with more breathing room.

Aintree tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Thornhill Park stands out for rapid growth and new development and generous parks and open space. Aintree generally means more sought-after housing, while Thornhill Park leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Aintree, while Thornhill Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons