Overall score
Aintree
60.5/100
Thornhill Park
46.5/100
Aintree for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Aintree
60.5/100
Thornhill Park
46.5/100
Crime rate
Aintree
52.4 / 1k
Thornhill Park
205.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aintree
102
Thornhill Park
24
Population
Aintree
7,982
Thornhill Park
3,066
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aintree | Thornhill Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.5/100 | 46.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 52.4 / 1k | 205.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | — |
| Public transport stops | 20 | 18 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 27.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 102 | 24 |
| Planning activity | 45 | 45 |
| Population | 7,982 | 3,066 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 7/10 |
Aintree reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Thornhill Park is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city. Aintree sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Thornhill Park is further out with more breathing room.
Aintree tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Thornhill Park stands out for rapid growth and new development and generous parks and open space. Aintree generally means more sought-after housing, while Thornhill Park leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Aintree, while Thornhill Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.