Overall score
Melton
52.8/100
Thornhill Park
46.5/100
Melton for families and investment; Thornhill Park for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Melton
52.8/100
Thornhill Park
46.5/100
Crime rate
Melton
207.6 / 1k
Thornhill Park
205.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Melton
27
Thornhill Park
24
Population
Melton
7,953
Thornhill Park
3,066
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Melton | Thornhill Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.8/100 | 46.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.6/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 207.6 / 1k | 205.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | — |
| Public transport stops | 59 | 18 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 27.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 27 | 24 |
| Planning activity | 119 | 45 |
| Population | 7,953 | 3,066 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 7/10 |
Melton is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm, while Thornhill Park is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city.
Melton pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Thornhill Park is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Melton sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Thornhill Park.
Melton suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Thornhill Park is the stronger match for retirees and value-focused buyers.