Overall score
Mount Cottrell
24.8/100
Rockbank
33.9/100
Mount Cottrell for schools; Rockbank for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Cottrell
24.8/100
Rockbank
33.9/100
Crime rate
Mount Cottrell
463.8 / 1k
Rockbank
310.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Cottrell
7
Rockbank
52
Population
Mount Cottrell
496
Rockbank
2,583
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Cottrell | Rockbank |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 24.8/100 | 33.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 17.2/100 | 60.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 463.8 / 1k | 310.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 14 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 52 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 36 |
| Green cover | 1.1% | 7.0% |
| Population | 496 | 2,583 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Mount Cottrell is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Rockbank is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Mount Cottrell sits among greener hillside streets, while Rockbank keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Cottrell is stronger for parks and reserves, plus a calmer planning outlook; Rockbank answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability. Mount Cottrell generally means more approachable housing costs, while Rockbank leans toward more approachable mid-market housing.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Rockbank, while Mount Cottrell remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.