Colbinabbin vs Waranga Shores, VIC Suburb Comparison

Colbinabbin for retirees and families; Waranga Shores for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ColbinabbinWaranga Shores

Overall score

Colbinabbin

47.2/100

Waranga Shores

36.4/100

Crime rate

Colbinabbin

28.1 / 1k

Waranga Shores

101.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Colbinabbin

3

Waranga Shores

5

Population

Colbinabbin

285

Waranga Shores

314

Metric leadColbinabbin 7Waranga Shores 22 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryColbinabbinWaranga Shores
Overall score47.2/10036.4/100
Housing (desirability)53.9/10050.0/100
Crime rate28.1 / 1k101.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)18.6/10018.6/100
Parks & reserves33
Public transport stops4—
Walkability6.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities35
Planning activity1113
Green cover1.7%0.0%
Population285314
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/102/10

Comparison summary

Colbinabbin is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Waranga Shores is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

On the data, Colbinabbin is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability; Waranga Shores answers with nearby cafés and amenities, plus a larger local community. Colbinabbin generally means more mid-market housing value, while Waranga Shores leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Colbinabbin, while Waranga Shores remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons