Overall score
College Park
49.4/100
Marden
50.2/100
College Park vs Marden, SA Suburb Comparison
College Park for families; Marden for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
College ParkMarden
Crime rate
College Park
26.4 / 1k
Marden
64.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
College Park
45
Marden
87
Population
College Park
755
Marden
2,645
Metric leadCollege Park 3Marden 81 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMarden
- Best for familiesCollege Park
- Best for investmentMarden
- Best for best valueMarden
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | College Park | Marden |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.4/100 | 50.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.0/100 | 65.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.4 / 1k | 64.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 12 |
| Walkability | 10.0/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 45 | 87 |
| Planning activity | 25 | 35 |
| Green cover | 3.5% | 14.1% |
| Population | 755 | 2,645 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
College Park reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Marden is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
College Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Marden is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.
Choose College Park if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Marden for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.