Overall score
Firle
52.5/100
Marden
50.2/100
Marden for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Firle
52.5/100
Marden
50.2/100
Crime rate
Firle
94.4 / 1k
Marden
64.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Firle
86
Marden
87
Population
Firle
1,508
Marden
2,645
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Firle | Marden |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.5/100 | 50.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.4/100 | 65.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.4 / 1k | 64.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 12 |
| Walkability | 89.5/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 86 | 87 |
| Planning activity | 22 | 35 |
| Green cover | 4.2% | 14.1% |
| Population | 1,508 | 2,645 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Firle is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Marden is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Firle tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook, while Marden stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Choose Firle if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Marden for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.