Overall score
Firle
52.5/100
Royston Park
51.1/100
Royston Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Firle
52.5/100
Royston Park
51.1/100
Crime rate
Firle
94.4 / 1k
Royston Park
25.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Firle
86
Royston Park
32
Population
Firle
1,508
Royston Park
1,246
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Firle | Royston Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.5/100 | 51.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.4/100 | 50.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.4 / 1k | 25.1 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 4 |
| Walkability | 89.5/100 | 10.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 86 | 32 |
| Planning activity | 22 | 22 |
| Green cover | 4.2% | 9.2% |
| Population | 1,508 | 1,246 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
Firle reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Royston Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
On the data, Firle is stronger for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Royston Park answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and tree cover and green space.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Royston Park, while Firle remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.