Overall score
Hackney
52.2/100
Royston Park
51.1/100
Hackney vs Royston Park, SA Suburb Comparison
Hackney for families and investment; Royston Park for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
HackneyRoyston Park
Crime rate
Hackney
281.0 / 1k
Royston Park
25.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hackney
94
Royston Park
32
Population
Hackney
575
Royston Park
1,246
Metric leadHackney 5Royston Park 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesRoyston Park
- Best for familiesHackney
- Best for investmentHackney
- Best for best schoolsHackney
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hackney | Royston Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.2/100 | 51.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.6/100 | 50.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 281.0 / 1k | 25.1 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 4 |
| Walkability | 33.0/100 | 10.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 94 | 32 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 22 |
| Green cover | 38.5% | 9.2% |
| Population | 575 | 1,246 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Hackney is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Royston Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Hackney tends to lead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space, while Royston Park stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a larger local community.
Households prioritising schools may find Hackney the better fit, while retirees and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Royston Park.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.