Collinsvale vs Rosetta, TAS Suburb Comparison

Collinsvale for investment and schools; Rosetta for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CollinsvaleRosetta

Overall score

Collinsvale

27.8/100

Rosetta

36.3/100

Crime rate

Collinsvale

79.0 / 1k

Rosetta

79.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Collinsvale

5

Rosetta

52

Population

Collinsvale

631

Rosetta

2,833

Metric leadCollinsvale 1Rosetta 82 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCollinsvaleRosetta
Overall score27.8/10036.3/100
Housing (desirability)40.8/10069.7/100
Crime rate79.0 / 1k79.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves13
Public transport stops—23
Walkability0.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities552
Green cover0.6%4.1%
Population6312,833
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Collinsvale is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, and Rosetta is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Collinsvale sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Rosetta is closer to the city centre.

Collinsvale tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Rosetta stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves. Collinsvale generally means more mid-market housing value, while Rosetta leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Rosetta, while Collinsvale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons