Overall score
Como
58.2/100
Illawong
61.7/100
Como vs Illawong, NSW suburb comparison
Como for schools; Illawong for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ComoIllawong
Crime rate
Como
31.5 / 1k
Illawong
20.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Como
204
Illawong
87
Population
Como
4,053
Illawong
7,427
Metric leadComo 3Illawong 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Como | Illawong |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.2/100 | 61.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.6/100 | 50.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 31.5 / 1k | 20.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 86 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 204 | 87 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 13 |
| Population | 4,053 | 7,427 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Como is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Illawong is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Como pulls ahead on schools and education options and walkability, whereas Illawong is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Como if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Illawong for retirees and investors.