Overall score
Como
58.2/100
Sutherland
62.5/100
Como vs Sutherland, NSW suburb comparison
Como for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ComoSutherland
Crime rate
Como
31.5 / 1k
Sutherland
70.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Como
204
Sutherland
335
Population
Como
4,053
Sutherland
11,570
Metric leadComo 3Sutherland 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Como | Sutherland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.2/100 | 62.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.6/100 | 20.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 31.5 / 1k | 70.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 12 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 65 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 85.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 204 | 335 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 15 |
| Population | 4,053 | 11,570 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Como is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Sutherland is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Como is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Sutherland answers with parks and reserves and public transport access.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Como, while Sutherland remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.