Miranda vs Sutherland, NSW suburb comparison

Miranda for investment and schools; Sutherland for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MirandaSutherland

Overall score

Miranda

63.0/100

Sutherland

62.5/100

Crime rate

Miranda

102.1 / 1k

Sutherland

70.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Miranda

471

Sutherland

335

Population

Miranda

17,942

Sutherland

11,570

Metric leadMiranda 7Sutherland 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMirandaSutherland
Overall score63.0/10062.5/100
Housing (desirability)24.0/10020.3/100
Crime rate102.1 / 1k70.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1512
Parks & reserves1112
Public transport stops14665
Walkability100.0/10085.0/100
Nearby amenities471335
Planning activity4215
Population17,94211,570
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Miranda is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Sutherland is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Miranda tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Sutherland stands out for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

Miranda suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Sutherland is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons