Overall score
Congupna
36.6/100
Lemnos
29.2/100
Congupna for investment and value; Lemnos for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Congupna
36.6/100
Lemnos
29.2/100
Crime rate
Congupna
66.7 / 1k
Lemnos
144.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Congupna
4
Lemnos
0
Population
Congupna
620
Lemnos
251
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Congupna | Lemnos |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.6/100 | 29.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.0/100 | 27.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 66.7 / 1k | 144.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 13.4/100 | 13.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 10 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Population | 620 | 251 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Congupna is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Lemnos is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Congupna is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Lemnos answers with a country-town feel.
On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Congupna, while Lemnos remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.