Cookernup vs Harvey, WA Suburb Comparison

Harvey for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CookernupHarvey

Overall score

Cookernup

34.7/100

Harvey

40.6/100

Crime rate

Cookernup

48.2 / 1k

Harvey

48.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cookernup

1

Harvey

29

Population

Cookernup

604

Harvey

3,462

Metric leadCookernup 1Harvey 72 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCookernupHarvey
Overall score34.7/10040.6/100
Housing (desirability)42.0/10055.5/100
Crime rate48.2 / 1k48.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)49.1/10049.1/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops34
Walkability4.5/1008.0/100
Nearby amenities129
Green cover2.1%9.1%
Population6043,462
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/102/10

Comparison summary

Cookernup reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Harvey is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

On the data, Cookernup is stronger for stronger socioeconomic advantage; Harvey answers with housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability. Cookernup generally means more approachable housing costs, while Harvey leans toward more sought-after housing.

Retirees and families may find Cookernup the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Harvey.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons