Cossack vs Katherine, NT suburb comparison

Cossack for investment; Katherine for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CossackKatherine

Overall score

Cossack

23.5/100

Katherine

47.8/100

Nearby amenities

Cossack

0

Katherine

86

Population

Cossack

1,293

Katherine

1,254

Metric leadCossack 2Katherine 31 tiedacross 6 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCossackKatherine
Overall score23.5/10047.8/100
Housing (desirability)44.6/10019.0/100
Schools & preschools5
Parks & reserves3
Walkability0.0/10022.0/100
Nearby amenities086
Population1,2931,254
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Cossack reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Katherine is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

Cossack tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Katherine stands out for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

Choose Cossack if you are weighing families and investors; lean toward Katherine for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons