Overall score
Cottesloe
65.3/100
Swanbourne
62.0/100
Cottesloe for beach lifestyle and schools; Swanbourne for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cottesloe
65.3/100
Swanbourne
62.0/100
Crime rate
Cottesloe
1493.6 / 1k
Swanbourne
2521.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cottesloe
795
Swanbourne
146
Population
Cottesloe
7,750
Swanbourne
4,592
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cottesloe | Swanbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.3/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.4/100 | 76.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 1493.6 / 1k | 2521.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 40 | 25 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 67.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 795 | 146 |
| Population | 7,750 | 4,592 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Cottesloe reads as a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone; Swanbourne is a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living.
Cottesloe pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, whereas Swanbourne is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options.
Cottesloe suits people chasing a beach lifestyle more clearly, whereas Swanbourne is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.