Overall score
Coutts Crossing
32.9/100
Glenreagh
37.1/100
Coutts Crossing for value; Glenreagh for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coutts Crossing
32.9/100
Glenreagh
37.1/100
Crime rate
Coutts Crossing
112.0 / 1k
Glenreagh
127.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coutts Crossing
0
Glenreagh
0
Population
Coutts Crossing
1,053
Glenreagh
1,005
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coutts Crossing | Glenreagh |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.9/100 | 37.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 88.3/100 | 70.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 112.0 / 1k | 127.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 116 | 103 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 7 |
| Population | 1,053 | 1,005 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Coutts Crossing is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Glenreagh is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Coutts Crossing tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Glenreagh stands out for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability.
Choose Coutts Crossing if you are weighing value-focused buyers; lean toward Glenreagh for retirees and families.