Overall score
Coutts Crossing
26.1/100
Glenreagh
27.7/100
Coutts Crossing for investment and value; Glenreagh for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coutts Crossing
26.1/100
Glenreagh
27.7/100
Crime rate
Coutts Crossing
112.0 / 1k
Glenreagh
127.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coutts Crossing
1
Glenreagh
2
Population
Coutts Crossing
1,053
Glenreagh
1,005
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coutts Crossing | Glenreagh |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 26.1/100 | 27.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.0/100 | 50.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 112.0 / 1k | 127.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 64.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 116 | 103 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 7 |
| Green cover | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| Population | 1,053 | 1,005 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Coutts Crossing is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Glenreagh is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Coutts Crossing tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access, while Glenreagh stands out for nearby cafés and amenities, plus overall desirability. Coutts Crossing generally means more approachable housing costs, while Glenreagh leans toward more sought-after housing.
Choose Coutts Crossing if you are weighing value-focused buyers; lean toward Glenreagh for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.