Overall score
Coutts Crossing
26.1/100
Elland
33.5/100
Elland for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coutts Crossing
26.1/100
Elland
33.5/100
Crime rate
Coutts Crossing
112.0 / 1k
Elland
111.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coutts Crossing
1
Elland
0
Population
Coutts Crossing
1,053
Elland
331
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coutts Crossing | Elland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 26.1/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.0/100 | 66.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 112.0 / 1k | 111.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 64.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Public transport stops | 116 | 21 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 3 |
| Green cover | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| Population | 1,053 | 331 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 5/10 |
Coutts Crossing is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Elland is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Coutts Crossing is stronger for public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community; Elland answers with a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook. Coutts Crossing generally means more approachable housing costs, while Elland leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Investors and households prioritising schools may find Coutts Crossing the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Elland.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.