Overall score
Elland
33.0/100
South Grafton
46.9/100
Elland for retirees; South Grafton for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Elland
33.0/100
South Grafton
46.9/100
Crime rate
Elland
111.1 / 1k
South Grafton
112.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Elland
0
South Grafton
18
Population
Elland
331
South Grafton
6,288
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Elland | South Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.0/100 | 46.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 88.3/100 | 74.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 111.1 / 1k | 112.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 12 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 139 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 18 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 24 |
| Population | 331 | 6,288 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 1/10 |
Elland is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while South Grafton is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
On the data, Elland is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; South Grafton answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access. Elland generally means more mid-market housing value, while South Grafton leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees may find Elland the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer South Grafton.