Clarenza vs South Grafton, NSW Suburb Comparison

Clarenza for value and schools; South Grafton for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClarenzaSouth Grafton

Overall score

Clarenza

32.3/100

South Grafton

31.0/100

Crime rate

Clarenza

112.9 / 1k

South Grafton

112.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clarenza

1

South Grafton

41

Population

Clarenza

602

South Grafton

6,288

Metric leadClarenza 4South Grafton 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClarenzaSouth Grafton
Overall score32.3/10031.0/100
Housing (desirability)57.3/10057.1/100
Crime rate112.9 / 1k112.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Weather (desirability)64.0/10064.0/100
Parks & reserves—12
Public transport stops44139
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities141
Planning activity528
Green cover0.3%1.2%
Population6026,288
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/101/10

Comparison summary

Clarenza is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while South Grafton is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

Clarenza pulls ahead on housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas South Grafton is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access. Clarenza generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while South Grafton leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Clarenza, while South Grafton remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons