Overall score
Clarenza
42.3/100
Grafton
62.0/100
Clarenza vs Grafton, NSW suburb comparison
Clarenza for retirees and families; Grafton for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ClarenzaGrafton
Crime rate
Clarenza
112.9 / 1k
Grafton
112.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clarenza
0
Grafton
149
Population
Clarenza
602
Grafton
10,563
Metric leadClarenza 3Grafton 7across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clarenza | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.3/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 88.3/100 | 82.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 112.9 / 1k | 112.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 14 |
| Public transport stops | 44 | 148 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 79.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 149 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 42 |
| Population | 602 | 10,563 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Clarenza is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Grafton is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
Clarenza pulls ahead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Grafton is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. Clarenza generally means more mid-market housing value, while Grafton leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees may find Clarenza the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Grafton.