Copmanhurst vs Grafton, NSW suburb comparison

Grafton for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CopmanhurstGrafton

Overall score

Copmanhurst

24.8/100

Grafton

62.0/100

Crime rate

Copmanhurst

112.3 / 1k

Grafton

112.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Copmanhurst

3

Grafton

149

Population

Copmanhurst

344

Grafton

10,563

Metric leadCopmanhurst 1Grafton 10across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCopmanhurstGrafton
Overall score24.8/10062.0/100
Housing (desirability)79.7/10082.5/100
Crime rate112.3 / 1k112.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Parks & reserves214
Public transport stops17148
Walkability25.5/10079.0/100
Nearby amenities3149
Planning activity243
Population34410,563
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Copmanhurst reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Grafton is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Copmanhurst sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Grafton is more regionally self-contained.

Copmanhurst pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Grafton is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Grafton, while Copmanhurst remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons