Overall score
Copmanhurst
29.4/100
Grafton
45.9/100
Copmanhurst vs Grafton, NSW Suburb Comparison
Grafton for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CopmanhurstGrafton
Crime rate
Copmanhurst
112.3 / 1k
Grafton
112.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Copmanhurst
8
Grafton
178
Population
Copmanhurst
344
Grafton
10,563
Metric leadCopmanhurst 1Grafton 111 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Copmanhurst | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 29.4/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 64.3/100 | 71.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 112.3 / 1k | 112.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 64.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 14 |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 148 |
| Walkability | 25.5/100 | 79.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 8 | 178 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 48 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 3.1% |
| Population | 344 | 10,563 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Copmanhurst reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Grafton is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Copmanhurst sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Grafton is more regionally self-contained.
Copmanhurst pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas Grafton is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Grafton, while Copmanhurst remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.