Overall score
Grafton
62.0/100
Seelands
26.6/100
Grafton vs Seelands, NSW suburb comparison
Grafton for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GraftonSeelands
Crime rate
Grafton
112.2 / 1k
Seelands
112.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Grafton
149
Seelands
1
Population
Grafton
10,563
Seelands
376
Metric leadGrafton 7Seelands 2across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Grafton | Seelands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.0/100 | 26.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 82.5/100 | 62.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 112.2 / 1k | 112.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | — |
| Public transport stops | 148 | 17 |
| Walkability | 79.0/100 | 25.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 149 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 43 | 1 |
| Population | 10,563 | 376 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Grafton reads as a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Seelands is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Grafton pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Seelands is the better pick for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Grafton generally means more approachable housing costs, while Seelands leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Grafton, while Seelands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.