Overall score
Grafton
45.9/100
Rushforth
33.2/100
Grafton vs Rushforth, NSW Suburb Comparison
Grafton for retirees and families; Rushforth for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GraftonRushforth
Crime rate
Grafton
112.2 / 1k
Rushforth
112.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Grafton
178
Rushforth
0
Population
Grafton
10,563
Rushforth
285
Metric leadGrafton 8Rushforth 21 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Grafton | Rushforth |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.9/100 | 33.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 71.3/100 | 58.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 112.2 / 1k | 112.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 64.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | — |
| Public transport stops | 148 | 14 |
| Walkability | 79.0/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 178 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 48 | 1 |
| Green cover | 3.1% | 0.0% |
| Population | 10,563 | 285 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Grafton is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Rushforth is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Grafton pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Rushforth is the better pick for housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Grafton generally means more approachable housing costs, while Rushforth leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Choose Grafton if you are weighing families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Rushforth for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.