Coffs Harbour vs Grafton, NSW Suburb Comparison

Grafton for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Coffs HarbourGrafton

Overall score

Coffs Harbour

48.7/100

Grafton

45.9/100

Crime rate

Coffs Harbour

127.4 / 1k

Grafton

112.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coffs Harbour

567

Grafton

178

Population

Coffs Harbour

27,089

Grafton

10,563

Metric leadCoffs Harbour 8Grafton 32 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoffs HarbourGrafton
Overall score48.7/10045.9/100
Housing (desirability)65.3/10071.3/100
Crime rate127.4 / 1k112.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools74
Weather (desirability)64.0/10064.0/100
Parks & reserves3714
Public transport stops421148
Walkability100.0/10079.0/100
Nearby amenities567178
Planning activity16048
Green cover16.6%3.1%
Population27,08910,563
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Coffs Harbour is a regional larger suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Grafton is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

On the data, Coffs Harbour is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Grafton answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook. Coffs Harbour generally means more sought-after housing, while Grafton leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Coffs Harbour suits retirees, families, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Grafton is the stronger match for value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons