Copmanhurst vs Waterview Heights, NSW Suburb Comparison

Copmanhurst for families; Waterview Heights for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CopmanhurstWaterview Heights

Overall score

Copmanhurst

29.4/100

Waterview Heights

35.2/100

Crime rate

Copmanhurst

112.3 / 1k

Waterview Heights

112.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Copmanhurst

8

Waterview Heights

0

Population

Copmanhurst

344

Waterview Heights

1,364

Metric leadCopmanhurst 4Waterview Heights 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCopmanhurstWaterview Heights
Overall score29.4/10035.2/100
Housing (desirability)64.3/10058.7/100
Crime rate112.3 / 1k112.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)64.0/10064.0/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops1740
Walkability25.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities80
Planning activity49
Green cover0.0%0.1%
Population3441,364
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/103/10

Comparison summary

Copmanhurst reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Waterview Heights is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Waterview Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Copmanhurst keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Copmanhurst tends to lead on parks and reserves, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook, while Waterview Heights stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.

Households prioritising schools may find Copmanhurst the better fit, while retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Waterview Heights.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons