Overall score
Junction Hill
43.6/100
Waterview Heights
35.2/100
Junction Hill for retirees and families; Waterview Heights for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Junction Hill
43.6/100
Waterview Heights
35.2/100
Crime rate
Junction Hill
112.1 / 1k
Waterview Heights
112.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Junction Hill
17
Waterview Heights
0
Population
Junction Hill
1,547
Waterview Heights
1,364
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Junction Hill | Waterview Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.6/100 | 35.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 70.0/100 | 58.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 112.1 / 1k | 112.0 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 64.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 22 | 40 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 17 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 9 |
| Green cover | 2.5% | 0.1% |
| Population | 1,547 | 1,364 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Junction Hill reads as a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Waterview Heights is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Waterview Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Junction Hill keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Junction Hill pulls ahead on parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Waterview Heights is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and a calmer planning outlook. Junction Hill generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Waterview Heights leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Neither suburb has a sharp audience split here. The better choice between Junction Hill and Waterview Heights comes down to which lifestyle trade-offs matter most to you.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.