South Grafton vs Waterview Heights, NSW Suburb Comparison

South Grafton for retirees and families; Waterview Heights for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

South GraftonWaterview Heights

Overall score

South Grafton

31.0/100

Waterview Heights

35.2/100

Crime rate

South Grafton

112.2 / 1k

Waterview Heights

112.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

South Grafton

41

Waterview Heights

0

Population

South Grafton

6,288

Waterview Heights

1,364

Metric leadSouth Grafton 6Waterview Heights 51 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySouth GraftonWaterview Heights
Overall score31.0/10035.2/100
Housing (desirability)57.1/10058.7/100
Crime rate112.2 / 1k112.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools4—
Weather (desirability)64.0/10064.0/100
Parks & reserves121
Public transport stops13940
Walkability32.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities410
Planning activity289
Green cover1.2%0.1%
Population6,2881,364
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/103/10

Comparison summary

South Grafton reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Waterview Heights is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Waterview Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while South Grafton keeps a flatter suburban layout.

South Grafton pulls ahead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Waterview Heights is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

South Grafton suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Waterview Heights is the stronger match for retirees and investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons