Overall score
Cressy
39.9/100
Evandale
42.3/100
Cressy vs Evandale, TAS Suburb Comparison
Cressy for investment; Evandale for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CressyEvandale
Crime rate
Cressy
18.3 / 1k
Evandale
18.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cressy
11
Evandale
2
Population
Cressy
1,149
Evandale
1,265
Metric leadCressy 4Evandale 53 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cressy | Evandale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.9/100 | 42.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.5/100 | 71.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.3 / 1k | 18.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 8 | 1 |
| Walkability | 12.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 11 | 2 |
| Green cover | 3.9% | 1.4% |
| Population | 1,149 | 1,265 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Cressy is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Evandale is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Cressy sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Evandale is more regionally self-contained.
On the data, Cressy is stronger for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Evandale answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and overall desirability. Cressy generally means more approachable housing costs, while Evandale leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Evandale, while Cressy remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.