Croydon Park vs Kilburn, SA suburb comparison

Croydon Park for investment and value; Kilburn for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Croydon ParkKilburn

Overall score

Croydon Park

51.8/100

Kilburn

52.4/100

Crime rate

Croydon Park

74.1 / 1k

Kilburn

118.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Croydon Park

108

Kilburn

210

Population

Croydon Park

4,230

Kilburn

5,633

Metric leadCroydon Park 4Kilburn 5across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCroydon ParkKilburn
Overall score51.8/10052.4/100
Housing (desirability)52.1/10027.6/100
Crime rate74.1 / 1k118.4 / 1k
Public transport stops1728
Walkability70.5/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities108210
Planning activity4766
Population4,2305,633
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/101/10

Comparison summary

Croydon Park reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Kilburn is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Croydon Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Kilburn is the better pick for public transport access and walkability.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Croydon Park, while Kilburn remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons