Ferryden Park vs Kilburn, SA Suburb Comparison

Ferryden Park for investment and value; Kilburn for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Ferryden ParkKilburn

Overall score

Ferryden Park

32.9/100

Kilburn

35.1/100

Crime rate

Ferryden Park

47.1 / 1k

Kilburn

118.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ferryden Park

73

Kilburn

210

Population

Ferryden Park

4,495

Kilburn

5,633

Metric leadFerryden Park 4Kilburn 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFerryden ParkKilburn
Overall score32.9/10035.1/100
Housing (desirability)62.5/10038.7/100
Crime rate47.1 / 1k118.4 / 1k
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops1428
Walkability38.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities73210
Planning activity3176
Green cover0.9%2.9%
Population4,4955,633
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Ferryden Park reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Kilburn is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Ferryden Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Kilburn is the better pick for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Ferryden Park the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kilburn.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons