Overall score
Crystal Brook
30.8/100
Napperby
30.9/100
Crystal Brook for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Crystal Brook
30.8/100
Napperby
30.9/100
Crime rate
Crystal Brook
38.6 / 1k
Napperby
85.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Crystal Brook
1
Napperby
13
Population
Crystal Brook
1,537
Napperby
666
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Crystal Brook | Napperby |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.8/100 | 30.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.5/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 38.6 / 1k | 85.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 13 |
| Planning activity | 22 | 5 |
| Population | 1,537 | 666 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Crystal Brook is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Napperby is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Crystal Brook is stronger for a quieter safety profile and walkability; Napperby answers with housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Crystal Brook, while Napperby remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.