Napperby vs Risdon Park South, SA Suburb Comparison

Napperby for retirees and families; Risdon Park South for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NapperbyRisdon Park South

Overall score

Napperby

40.6/100

Risdon Park South

33.2/100

Crime rate

Napperby

44.4 / 1k

Risdon Park South

61.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Napperby

14

Risdon Park South

0

Population

Napperby

666

Risdon Park South

2,230

Metric leadNapperby 5Risdon Park South 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNapperbyRisdon Park South
Overall score40.6/10033.2/100
Housing (desirability)49.4/10066.8/100
Crime rate44.4 / 1k61.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)19.1/10019.1/100
Public transport stops—13
Walkability0.0/10019.5/100
Nearby amenities140
Planning activity743
Green cover26.8%0.1%
Population6662,230
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Napperby is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Risdon Park South is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Napperby tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space, while Risdon Park South stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and overall desirability.

Choose Napperby if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Risdon Park South for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons