Cungulla vs Nome, QLD suburb comparison

Nome for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CungullaNome

Overall score

Cungulla

19.7/100

Nome

26.1/100

Crime rate

Cungulla

81.0 / 1k

Nome

79.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cungulla

1

Nome

1

Population

Cungulla

307

Nome

990

Metric leadCungulla 0Nome 52 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

  • Best for retireesNome
  • Best for investmentNome
  • Best for best valueNome

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCungullaNome
Overall score19.7/10026.1/100
Housing (desirability)2.6/10011.9/100
Crime rate81.0 / 1k79.4 / 1k
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities11
Population307990
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cungulla is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Nome is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Cungulla tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, while Nome stands out for housing affordability and overall desirability. Cungulla generally means more approachable housing costs, while Nome leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Nome, while Cungulla remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons

Cungulla vs Nome, QLD suburb comparison | Suburb Guide