Cungulla vs Nome, QLD Suburb Comparison

Nome for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CungullaNome

Overall score

Cungulla

21.2/100

Nome

30.4/100

Crime rate

Cungulla

127.0 / 1k

Nome

128.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cungulla

2

Nome

2

Population

Cungulla

307

Nome

990

Metric leadCungulla 1Nome 62 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

  • Best for familiesNome
  • Best for best valueNome
  • Best for best schoolsNome

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCungullaNome
Overall score21.2/10030.4/100
Housing (desirability)44.2/10048.9/100
Crime rate127.0 / 1k128.9 / 1k
Weather (desirability)7.3/10019.8/100
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities22
Green cover0.0%0.2%
Population307990
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cungulla is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Nome is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Cungulla tends to lead on a country-town feel and relatively affordable housing, while Nome stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability. Cungulla generally means more approachable housing costs, while Nome leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Nome, while Cungulla remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons