Curramulka vs Stansbury, SA Suburb Comparison

Curramulka for retirees and families; Stansbury for beach lifestyle and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CurramulkaStansbury

Overall score

Curramulka

39.3/100

Stansbury

36.9/100

Crime rate

Curramulka

6.3 / 1k

Stansbury

15.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Curramulka

0

Stansbury

4

Population

Curramulka

304

Stansbury

603

Metric leadCurramulka 6Stansbury 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCurramulkaStansbury
Overall score39.3/10036.9/100
Housing (desirability)55.7/10042.3/100
Crime rate6.3 / 1k15.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops—4
Walkability0.0/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities04
Planning activity316
Green cover2.4%2.3%
Population304603
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/103/10

Comparison summary

Curramulka is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Stansbury is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Stansbury leans into coastal living, while Curramulka feels more inland and suburban in character.

Curramulka tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and tree cover and green space, while Stansbury stands out for schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Curramulka generally means more mid-market housing value, while Stansbury leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Curramulka suits retirees and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Stansbury is the stronger match for families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons