Overall score
Curramulka
30.4/100
Stansbury
24.6/100
Curramulka for retirees and value; Stansbury for families and beach lifestyle.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Curramulka
30.4/100
Stansbury
24.6/100
Crime rate
Curramulka
6.3 / 1k
Stansbury
15.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Curramulka
0
Stansbury
0
Population
Curramulka
304
Stansbury
603
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Curramulka | Stansbury |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.4/100 | 24.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 25.4/100 | 10.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 6.3 / 1k | 15.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 4 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 14 |
| Population | 304 | 603 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Curramulka is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Stansbury is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Stansbury leans into coastal living, while Curramulka feels more inland and suburban in character.
Curramulka tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Stansbury stands out for schools and education options and walkability. Curramulka generally means more mid-market housing value, while Stansbury leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Curramulka suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Stansbury is the stronger match for families and people chasing a beach lifestyle.