Currumbin Valley vs Currumbin Waters, QLD Suburb Comparison

Currumbin Valley for families and schools; Currumbin Waters for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Currumbin ValleyCurrumbin Waters

Overall score

Currumbin Valley

57.5/100

Currumbin Waters

58.9/100

Crime rate

Currumbin Valley

38.4 / 1k

Currumbin Waters

38.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Currumbin Valley

16

Currumbin Waters

99

Population

Currumbin Valley

2,084

Currumbin Waters

9,797

Metric leadCurrumbin Valley 4Currumbin Waters 7across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCurrumbin ValleyCurrumbin Waters
Overall score57.5/10058.9/100
Housing (desirability)47.0/10061.5/100
Crime rate38.4 / 1k38.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)42.8/10033.9/100
Parks & reserves62
Public transport stops—34
Walkability2.0/10086.0/100
Nearby amenities1699
Green cover8.9%7.9%
Population2,0849,797
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Currumbin Valley reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Currumbin Waters is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Currumbin Valley sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Currumbin Waters is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Currumbin Valley is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Currumbin Waters answers with schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools may find Currumbin Valley the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Currumbin Waters.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons