Darlington vs Greenmount, WA Suburb Comparison

Darlington for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DarlingtonGreenmount

Overall score

Darlington

55.5/100

Greenmount

41.1/100

Crime rate

Darlington

45.7 / 1k

Greenmount

45.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Darlington

59

Greenmount

43

Population

Darlington

3,725

Greenmount

2,666

Metric leadDarlington 9Greenmount 12 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDarlingtonGreenmount
Overall score55.5/10041.1/100
Housing (desirability)45.8/10044.8/100
Crime rate45.7 / 1k45.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops3729
Walkability34.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities5943
Green cover54.5%7.1%
Population3,7252,666
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/106/10

Comparison summary

Darlington is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Greenmount is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Greenmount sits among greener hillside streets, while Darlington keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Darlington pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Greenmount is the better pick for schools and education options.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Darlington, while Greenmount remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons