Darlington vs Greenmount, WA suburb comparison

Darlington for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DarlingtonGreenmount

Overall score

Darlington

49.3/100

Greenmount

41.7/100

Crime rate

Darlington

2603.4 / 1k

Greenmount

3484.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Darlington

50

Greenmount

28

Population

Darlington

3,725

Greenmount

2,666

Metric leadDarlington 9Greenmount 1across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDarlingtonGreenmount
Overall score49.3/10041.7/100
Housing (desirability)46.5/10034.5/100
Crime rate2603.4 / 1k3484.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops3729
Walkability34.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities5028
Population3,7252,666
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/106/10

Comparison summary

Darlington is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Greenmount is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Greenmount sits among greener hillside streets, while Darlington keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Darlington pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Greenmount is the better pick for excellent public transport and improving crime trends.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Darlington, while Greenmount remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons