Darlington vs Greenmount, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Darlington | Greenmount |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.5/100 | 34.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.5/100 | 34.5/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 29 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 50 | 28 |
| Population | 3,725 | 2,666 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 6/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesDarlington
- Best for familiesDarlington
- Best for investmentDarlington
- Best for best valueDarlington
- Best for best schoolsDarlington
Comparison summary
Darlington is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Greenmount is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Greenmount sits among greener hillside streets, while Darlington keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Darlington pulls ahead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, whereas Greenmount is the better pick for excellent public transport.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Darlington, while Greenmount remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.