Overall score
Darlington
49.3/100
Glen Forrest
44.5/100
Darlington for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Darlington
49.3/100
Glen Forrest
44.5/100
Crime rate
Darlington
2603.4 / 1k
Glen Forrest
3482.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Darlington
50
Glen Forrest
34
Population
Darlington
3,725
Glen Forrest
2,789
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Darlington | Glen Forrest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.3/100 | 44.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.5/100 | 34.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 2603.4 / 1k | 3482.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 35 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 50 | 34 |
| Population | 3,725 | 2,789 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Darlington is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Glen Forrest is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Darlington sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Glen Forrest is further out with more breathing room.
Darlington pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Glen Forrest is the better pick for excellent public transport and an affluent, sought-after address.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Darlington, while Glen Forrest remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.