Darlington vs Glen Forrest, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Darlington | Glen Forrest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.5/100 | 36.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.5/100 | 34.5/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 35 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 50 | 34 |
| Population | 3,725 | 2,789 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesDarlington
- Best for familiesDarlington
- Best for investmentDarlington
- Best for best valueDarlington
- Best for best schoolsDarlington
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Darlington is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Glen Forrest is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Darlington sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Glen Forrest is further out with more breathing room.
Darlington pulls ahead on housing affordability and public transport access, whereas Glen Forrest is the better pick for excellent public transport and an affluent, sought-after address.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Darlington, while Glen Forrest remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.