Darlington vs Glen Forrest, WA suburb comparison

Darlington for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DarlingtonGlen Forrest

Overall score

Darlington

49.3/100

Glen Forrest

44.5/100

Crime rate

Darlington

2603.4 / 1k

Glen Forrest

3482.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Darlington

50

Glen Forrest

34

Population

Darlington

3,725

Glen Forrest

2,789

Metric leadDarlington 7Glen Forrest 03 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDarlingtonGlen Forrest
Overall score49.3/10044.5/100
Housing (desirability)46.5/10034.5/100
Crime rate2603.4 / 1k3482.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Parks & reserves22
Public transport stops3735
Walkability34.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities5034
Population3,7252,789
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Darlington is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Glen Forrest is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Darlington sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Glen Forrest is further out with more breathing room.

Darlington pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Glen Forrest is the better pick for excellent public transport and an affluent, sought-after address.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Darlington, while Glen Forrest remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons