Boya vs Glen Forrest, WA Suburb Comparison

Glen Forrest for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BoyaGlen Forrest

Overall score

Boya

44.8/100

Glen Forrest

52.3/100

Crime rate

Boya

43.1 / 1k

Glen Forrest

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Boya

18

Glen Forrest

55

Population

Boya

669

Glen Forrest

2,789

Metric leadBoya 2Glen Forrest 63 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBoyaGlen Forrest
Overall score44.8/10052.3/100
Housing (desirability)48.2/10043.8/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves—2
Public transport stops835
Walkability12.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities1855
Green cover6.6%62.3%
Population6692,789
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Boya is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Glen Forrest is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Boya tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Glen Forrest stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Boya the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Glen Forrest.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons