Boya vs Glen Forrest, WA suburb comparison

Boya for retirees and families; Glen Forrest for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BoyaGlen Forrest

Overall score

Boya

36.2/100

Glen Forrest

44.6/100

Crime rate

Boya

12586.8 / 1k

Glen Forrest

3482.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Boya

12

Glen Forrest

34

Population

Boya

669

Glen Forrest

2,789

Metric leadBoya 1Glen Forrest 71 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBoyaGlen Forrest
Overall score36.2/10044.6/100
Housing (desirability)30.2/10034.5/100
Crime rate12586.8 / 1k3482.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops835
Walkability12.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities1234
Population6692,789
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Boya is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Glen Forrest is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Boya sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Glen Forrest is further out with more breathing room.

Boya tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Glen Forrest stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Retirees may find Boya the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Glen Forrest.

Related comparisons