Glen Forrest vs Mahogany Creek, WA Suburb Comparison

Glen Forrest for families and investment; Mahogany Creek for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Glen ForrestMahogany Creek

Overall score

Glen Forrest

52.3/100

Mahogany Creek

46.1/100

Crime rate

Glen Forrest

43.1 / 1k

Mahogany Creek

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glen Forrest

55

Mahogany Creek

13

Population

Glen Forrest

2,789

Mahogany Creek

829

Metric leadGlen Forrest 7Mahogany Creek 22 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlen ForrestMahogany Creek
Overall score52.3/10046.1/100
Housing (desirability)43.8/10063.0/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops3515
Walkability34.0/10022.5/100
Nearby amenities5513
Green cover62.3%70.3%
Population2,789829
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Glen Forrest is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Mahogany Creek is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Glen Forrest sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Mahogany Creek is further out with more breathing room.

Glen Forrest tends to lead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, while Mahogany Creek stands out for housing affordability. Glen Forrest generally means more sought-after housing, while Mahogany Creek leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Retirees and households prioritising schools may find Glen Forrest the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mahogany Creek.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons