Glen Forrest vs Hovea, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Glen Forrest | Hovea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.7/100 | 34.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 34.5/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Public transport stops | 35 | 12 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 34 | 19 |
| Population | 2,789 | 713 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesHovea
- Best for familiesGlen Forrest
- Best for investmentHovea
- Best for best valueHovea
- Best for best schoolsGlen Forrest
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Glen Forrest is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, and Hovea is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.
Glen Forrest pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Hovea is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Glen Forrest suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Hovea is the stronger match for retirees and investors.